Kosovo President Justina Shiroka-Pula’s decision to return it to the Parliament to review the Law for Specialised Chambers and the Specialised Prosecutor’s Office has brought the debate about the Special Court and its operation back into focus.
Following the approval of legal changes by MPs, the issue has taken on a new institutional development, opening the possibility for further parliamentary review.
Law returns came after Kosovo Democratic Party request ( The PDK, which had supported the initiative for relevant changes.
Vetevendosje Movement MP Adnan Rrustemi for Front Online has spoken about the return of the Special Law to the president, saying such an act represents rejection of law enforcement.
Rrustem made it known that there are two possibilities from the procedural point of view.
Restitution of a law adopted by the assembly by the president is a refusal to implement it, and there are usually only two options or the same law returns without any change and then goes into force against the will of the president or should be launched as the new legal initiative, he said.
He voiced hope that the PDK will take the necessary steps as soon as possible, until he said part of the MPs would contribute to the issue.
I wish that the sponsor would take his action. The reasoning given is general, but it seems to have been his request to sponsor. Will MPs are willing to make the contribution, there is not much room in treatment as complete change, it is not the middle of procedure, the president has restored it, Rrustemi said.
Democratic Party of Kosovo MP Ariana Musliu-Scheshi for EURFront Online has been declared regarding the return of Special Law from president, saying the position of the president The PDK is to reconsider the law to be legally empowered and not cancelled.
Musliu-Shoshi has declared that her party’s goal remains to protect KLA rescue rights and ensure a fair judicial process.
First of all, I want to make it clear that the PDK didn’t ask for an annulment of the law, but its review to empower it legally. Our goal remains unchanged: protecting KLA rescue rights and guaranteeing a fair judicial process, she has declared.
She has said she expects the responsible parliamentary commission to review professional recommendations that were presented in the final phase of the law’s adoption.
We expect the responsible parliamentary commission to review professional recommendations that have come to the final phase of the law’s adoption and that we have not had time to address, Musliu-Sashi has indicated.
As far as possible changes in the law are concerned, the PDK deputy has indicated they are considering some legal solutions.
As far as concrete changes are concerned, some judicial solutions are currently under consideration and it would not be serious to prejudge before they finally agree, she said.
Musliu-Shoshi has also turned to MPs who oppose the return of the law, recalling that it was approved by the Parliament and not only by PDK deputies.
As for MPs who oppose the return, I would like to remind them that this law has been voted by the Parliament, not only by the PDK. Therefore, the responsibility to complete this process is shared, Musliu-Sshi stated.
It has called for political will and institutional responsibility, rejecting party obstacles in the process.
We expect political will and institutional responsibility, not party barriers, Musliu-Sshi stressed.
The PDK MP has underlined that for her party it is not only important that the law be voted on, but also that it be legally stable and applicable.
For us, it is not only important that the law be voted into office, but that it be legally sustainable, applicable, and actually serves our deliverers. The KLA and the protection of liberation rights should not be held hostage by political calculations, she said.
The signal where the truth speaks before the news!
Source Layer: Signal
