State Chief Prosecutor Zejnullah Gashi has redefinated three criminal substances linking the case of Arlinda Zekaj- Sylajt from the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pec to the Founding Prosecutor in Pristina.
According to the State Prosecutor’s Office’s Office announcement, decisions have been made in view of the particular importance of these issues, serious consequences and the need for effective, objective and impartial treatment.
State Chief Prosecutor Zejnaul Gashi, in the exercise of his legal competencies, has issued three (3) verdicts to re-determination of criminal subjects linking the case of Arlinda Zekay-Sylaj, from the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pec to the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina.
Decisions have been made in support of Article 20, paragraph 2, of the State Prosecutor’s Law, taking into account the particular importance of these issues, the serious consequences that have resulted, and the need to ensure effective, objective and impartial treatment of subjects. Reassigning these subjects is intended to ensure that they are handled with proper care, attention, and seriousness, in accordance with the law and with the importance of the circumstances of each case, the report says.
According to the State Chief Prosecutor’s Office, the assessment will be based on facts, documentation and relevant evidence, without prejudged the responsibility of any person.
The chief state prosecutor has reiterated that protection of life, law enforcement and institutional accountability are obligations that cannot be neglected, while any suspicion of inadequate inaction or treatment should be considered until the full clarification of circumstances.
In parallel with re-assigning the subjects, the Chief State Prosecutor’s Office is thoroughly analyzing all acts and institutional inactions related to handling cases reported by the deceased. This process includes reviewing the chronology of taken actions, making decisions, risk assessment and measures undertaken for its protection, as well as any other relevant circumstance for determining eventual responsibilities.
The chief state prosecutor’s office will require full accountability for any violations of the law, negligence or inaction that could be found. If violations or responsibilities are identified, rigorous measures will be taken and responsibility will be required for each official, in accordance with relevant law and competencies. The purpose of this process is to make all circumstances fully clear, identify eventual shortcomings and ensure that institutional and individual responsibility is handled with the proper seriousness. The assessment will be developed on the basis of facts, documentation and related evidence, without prejudgment of any person’s responsibility.
The State Chief Prosecutor re-composes that protection of life, law enforcement and institutional accountability are obligations that cannot be neglected. Law institutions have special responsibilities for each report to be treated with the necessary seriousness and urgency and that any suspicion of inaction or inadequate treatment be considered until the full clarification of circumstances.
The State Chief Prosecutor’s Office remains committed to this process developing with impartiality, professionalism and determination, in the function of law enforcement, ensuring the accountability and maintaining public confidence in the prosecutorial system, it is said further in the statement.
Source Layer: Dukeagini
