Kosovo Judiciary Council ( The KCJ has come up with a detailed communiqué concerning the case of Arlinda Zekay-Sylaj, who was brutally killed in Vitomirica of Pec, publicising the results of extraordinary inspection at the Pec Foundation Court.

According to the KDR, the inspection has concluded that the late one had a defense order all the time, while the indictment against her husband, Jeton Sylaj, was accepted in court only on October 26, 2026, the day after her murder.

In the communiqué published on October 28th, the KDR reports that its leader, Rrustem Thaci, had urgently requested from the Judiciary Inspectation Unit, reviewing all actions undertaken by the Constitutional Court in Pec concerning the C.n.1300/2026 case.

The inspection is conducted on October 26th, while the final report has been submitted to the KDR on October 28th.

K JC: Arlinda had a protective order since September 7th.

According to the results of the inspection, the Constitutional Court in Pec had accepted on September 7th 2026 the request for the pronunciation of the emergency defence order.

The same day, the court had made a decision to appoint an emergency defence order for Arlinda Zekiay-Sylay.

However, opposition to this decision was presented by the protected side and representative for the protection of the victims only in the part involved in the child’s faith and allimentation.

On October 16, 2026, the Constitutional Court in Pec had issued another ruling through which it approved the request of the defense party.

The CGEC points out that no complaint was filed against this act.

According to the Council, both decisions were forwarded to the Kosovo Police for execution.

The act against her husband was accepted after Arlinda’s murder

Another important detail derived from the report is the time when the Constitutional Court in Pec had accepted the indictment against the victim’s husband.

K JCK has announced that on October 26, 2026, at 8:56, the court had accepted the act of Constitutional Prosecution in Pec in number PP/ II No.1340/2026, versus Sylayt.

The indictment was admitted to court after Arlinda Zekaj-Sylaj was killed.

According to the communiqué, the indictment was immediately registered in the physical and electronic registry, numberd P.N.832/2026.

K JCK: Albert Syley didn’t figure out the paperwork on this subject

Another inspection conclusion is linked to the suspect in Arlinda’s murder.

According to the KGS, only Arlinda Zekay-Sylay as a protected party and her husband, Jeton Sylaj, as a responsible party.

No letter of this subject, according to the Council, was included by Albert Sylaj, who was suspected of committing the murder.

This consisting is about the documentation of the controlled subject and not necessarily all the information other institutions may have had.

Arlinda had complained to the president of the Court about illegal decision-making

The report also finds that Arlinda Zekiaj-Sylaj, on 17 September 2026, was addressed at the request to the head of the Foundation Court in Pec.

In that request, she had claimed that the judge of the case had illegally and outside legal terms.

According to the KDR, the court’s chairman, the same day, had sought clarification from the judge of the actions taken.

The judge had responded on September 17th, while on October 20, the court chief had responded to Arlinda, clarifying the actions taken by the institution.

Just five days later, Arlinda Zekaj-Sylaj was killed.

K JSK denies accepting request from Arlinda

In its communiqué, the KDR has also responded to reports that the chairman of the Council had accepted requests from the victim.

The institution has denied these claims, stressing that from controlling physical and electronic evidence does not result in any request from Arlinda Zekiaj-Sylay.

K The JPS has clarified that verification was made in the physical registry of paperwork, in secretaries and in official E – mail.

In the end, the Judiciary Council has warned that it will take all necessary legal actions, including eventual measures against those for whom their actions or inactions have been in conflict with the legislation in force.

However, the communiqué does not reveal whether the inspection has identified concrete disciplinary violations by any judge or judicial official.

The Arlinda Zekiaj-Sylaj case has prompted numerous public reactions and has raised serious questions about the functioning of institutional mechanisms to protect victims of domestic violence.

Despite the existence of the defense order, Arlinda failed to escape the murder, while remaining to clarify whether and how the court-set measures have been implemented in practice.

Note: Those who are referred to in this article are represented innocent until their guilt is proved by court – form decision.

The signal where the truth speaks before the news!

/Gazeta Sinjali/

Source Layer: Signal